From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 28, 1963
189 N.E.2d 627 (N.Y. 1963)

Opinion

Argued January 21, 1963

Decided February 28, 1963

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, J. VINCENT KEOGH, J.

Anthony Romano and Robert J. Randell for appellant.

Leo A. Larkin, Corporation Counsel ( Irving Genn and Seymour B. Quel of counsel), for respondent.


Order modified by increasing the amount of the recovery by $3,500 as damages for fixtures taken and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum: This high, tight wire fence with signs, wiring and grating was especially designed and constructed for this area with the consequence that these installations are treated as fixtures (see opinion in Marraro v. State of New York, 12 N.Y.2d 285, decided herewith). Although they belonged to the owner of the land appropriated, they were separately valued by direction of the Appellate Division ( 10 A.D.2d 865) and, since no objection has been made thereto, we are not called upon to say whether a different rule should be applied in determining the procedure to be adopted or the damages to be fixed where the fixtures and the fee are owned by the same person.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, FOSTER and SCILEPPI.


Summaries of

Matter of City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 28, 1963
189 N.E.2d 627 (N.Y. 1963)
Case details for

Matter of City of New York

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, Relative to Acquiring…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 28, 1963

Citations

189 N.E.2d 627 (N.Y. 1963)
189 N.E.2d 627
239 N.Y.S.2d 133