From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Chisholm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1920
192 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Opinion

May, 1920.


If there is any merit in the suggestion of the learned counsel for appellant that the proceeding should be opened for the purpose of permitting him to call another witness, application for that relief should be addressed to the surrogate. So far as the "private conversation" to which the record refers is concerned, it appeared upon the argument that it related to a conversation between counsel for the respective parties and appellant's counsel with the court, which was of no material consequence. Decree and order of the Surrogate's Court of Nassau county affirmed, with costs. Jenks, P.J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Chisholm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1920
192 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
Case details for

Matter of Chisholm

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Probate of the Last Will and Testament of HANNAH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1920

Citations

192 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)