Opinion
Argued September 14, 1999
October 25, 1999
In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5 to establish paternity and for an award of child support, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Adams, J.).
ORDERED that the notice of appeal from the order is deemed to be an application of leave to appeal and leave is granted (see,Matter of Jane PP. v. Paul QQ., 64 N.Y.2d 15 ); and it is further,
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Under the particular facts of this case, the Family Court properly determined that the appellant is the father of the subject child (see, Jean Maby H. v. Joseph H., 246 A.D.2d 282 ; Matter of Richard W. v. Roberta Y., 240 A.D.2d 812 ; Matter of Ettore I. v. Angela D., 127 A.D.2d 6 ).
MANGANO, P.J., O'BRIEN, RITTER, and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.