From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Chartock v. Wood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 1999
267 A.D.2d 236 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted August 17, 1999

December 6, 1999

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (McNulty, J.), entered June 30, 1998, which dismissed the petition.

Michael O'Brien, Garden City, N.Y., for appellant.

Jerry M. Mims, Bellport, N.Y., for respondent.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., DAVID S. RITTER, DANIEL W. JOY, MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in dismissing the instant petition in order to ensure that all relevant files would be before it. The dismissal was without prejudice to an application to reinstate an earlier proceeding seeking the same relief under docket number V-2691-95, which contained, inter alia, full evaluations of the parties.

O'BRIEN, J.P., RITTER, JOY, ALTMAN, and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Chartock v. Wood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 1999
267 A.D.2d 236 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Chartock v. Wood

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT CHARTOCK, appellant, v. JILL WOOD, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 6, 1999

Citations

267 A.D.2d 236 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
699 N.Y.S.2d 315

Citing Cases

Jeffrey H. v. Crystal E.

ORDERED that orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Under the circumstances of this case, the…