Opinion
June 9, 1997
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
The instant proceeding was erroneously transferred to this Court pursuant to CPLR 7804 (g). Although the respondent made findings of fact based upon a quasi-judicial proceeding, the petitioners' only contention is that the penalty imposed upon them was arbitrary and capricious. Therefore, no substantial evidence question was brought up for review (see, Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222; Matter of Curry v. Blum, 73 A.D.2d 965). Nevertheless, this Court will retain jurisdiction for the purpose of deciding this case on the merits (see, Seaview Assn. v. Department of Envtl. Conservation, 123 A.D.2d 619).
The petitioners, an ambulette company and its owner, were enrolled in the Medicaid program to provide transportation services to Medicaid recipients for reimbursement by the respondent. The respondent audited the company and found that half of its drivers were unlicensed, and that many of its records for services rendered failed to identify the driver of the ambulette both of which constituted violations of the respondent's regulations.
The sanction imposed is consistent with the guidelines to be considered in determining such sanctions (see, 18 NYCRR 515.4), and is not so disproportionate to the nature of the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., supra).
Pizzuto, J.P., Santucci, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.