From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Charlene J

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 26, 2001
280 A.D.2d 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted January 31, 2001

February 26, 2001.

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal, as limited by the appellant's brief, is from so much of an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Hepner, J.), dated October 14, 1999, as, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated April 19, 1999, made upon the appellant`s admission, finding that she committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of attempted assault in the third degree, and adjudging her to be a juvenile delinquent, placed her with the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months.

Yasmin Daley Duncan, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Thomas M. Ross of counsel; Robert W. Ho on the brief), for respondent.

Before: SANTUCCI, J.P., ALTMAN, LUCIANO and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant challenges only so much of the order of disposition as placed her with the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months. Since the period of placement has expired, the appeal is academic (see, Matter of Carlos S., 243 A.D.2d 569; Matter of Ricardo R., 220 A.D.2d 431; Matter of Greg W., 213 A.D.2d 414).


Summaries of

Matter of Charlene J

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 26, 2001
280 A.D.2d 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Matter of Charlene J

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF CHARLENE J. (ANONYMOUS), APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 26, 2001

Citations

280 A.D.2d 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
721 N.Y.S.2d 541

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Raymond G

The appellant was not entitled to a missing-witness charge ( see, Matter of Paul N., 244 A.D.2d 488; cf.,…