Summary
In Matter of Chamberlain v. Vroman (296 N.Y. 689) only the authenticating affidavits of subscribing witnesses were involved and the court held they did not substantially comply with section 135 of the Election Law because such affidavit stated the residence from which each subscribing witness last registered "was then in" a specified election district instead of stating that said residence "is in" such election district.
Summary of this case from Matter of Naples v. CarrOpinion
Argued October 25, 1946
Decided October 25, 1946
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, BERGAN, J.
Victor Levine for appellant.
No appearance for respondents.
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ.