Opinion
May 22, 1995
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
Ordered that the motion is granted to the extent that the appeals are dismissed, without prejudice to the appellants seeking administrative review of the determination approving the vouchers, and the motion is otherwise denied.
The fee allowances to the Special District Attorneys do not constitute appealable orders made in the context of pending actions, and, therefore, are not subject to appellate review (see, CPLR 5701 [a]; cf., Matter of Werfel v Agresta, 36 N.Y.2d 624). Mangano, P.J., Sullivan, Balletta, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.