From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Cassel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 20, 1995
220 A.D.2d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

October 20, 1995


We conclude that petitioner has not shown by clear and convincing evidence that he possesses the character and general fitness to resume the practice of law (see, 22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]). We especially note the circumstances of his involvement with his former client Elaine Veve which, in part, resulted in his suspension from practice (see, Matter of Cassel, supra.)

Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the application for reinstatement be and the same hereby is denied.


Summaries of

Matter of Cassel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 20, 1995
220 A.D.2d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Cassel

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN M. CASSEL, a Suspended Attorney, Petitioner…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 20, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
632 N.Y.S.2d 984