Opinion
October 20, 1995
We conclude that petitioner has not shown by clear and convincing evidence that he possesses the character and general fitness to resume the practice of law (see, 22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]). We especially note the circumstances of his involvement with his former client Elaine Veve which, in part, resulted in his suspension from practice (see, Matter of Cassel, supra.)
Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the application for reinstatement be and the same hereby is denied.