From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Casey v. Casey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 13, 1939
257 App. Div. 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Opinion

June 13, 1939.

Appeal from Surrogate's Court of Rensselaer County.

Present — Hill, P.J., Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.


It was established that John L. Casey had worked on the farm for eight years before the death of the testatrix. During the first two of those years the farm was operated by the then owner, Daniel Casey, a brother of testatrix and claimant, who devised it to this testatrix. She conducted it for six years and until the time of her death, with the aid of John L. Casey, who did general farm work for eight or nine months of each year, and during the remaining months performed some work. The value of the services, their performance, the expectation to pay therefor, and non-payment, were established by disinterested witnesses. The nephew, Joseph Casey, Jr., worked on the farm occasionally — he helped harvest the crops, cut wood, etc. His claim for ninety-three dollars was established by competent proof. Decree unanimously affirmed, with costs payable out of the estate, to the attorney for respondent, John L. Casey.


Summaries of

Matter of Casey v. Casey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 13, 1939
257 App. Div. 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)
Case details for

Matter of Casey v. Casey

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JOHN L. CASEY, Respondent, against the…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 13, 1939

Citations

257 App. Div. 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Citing Cases

Cherico v. Cherico

Although there are certain factual disputes regarding the pertinent details of the wife's living situation…