From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Caruso v. Casciola

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 16, 1970
261 N.E.2d 907 (N.Y. 1970)

Opinion

Argued June 15, 1970

Decided June 16, 1970

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, MILES F. McDONALD, J.

Ronald D'Angelo, appellant in person and for remaining appellants.

Ronald J. Meiselman for respondents.


Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: Although it is true that several of the signatures herein were improperly validated by Special Term in that the notaries public or commissioners of deeds had not taken oaths of certain signatories (Election Law, § 135, subd. 2; see Matter of Helfand v. Meisser, 22 N.Y.2d 762), the remaining valid signatures were far in excess of the amount required for designation. Moreover, although the technical irregularity of failing to administer the oath is sufficient to invalidate a signature, it is not the type of defect which would warrant invalidating the entire petition even though a sufficient number of valid signatures remained ( Matter of Clum v. Holmes, 194 Misc. 863).

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and JUDGES BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.


Summaries of

Matter of Caruso v. Casciola

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 16, 1970
261 N.E.2d 907 (N.Y. 1970)
Case details for

Matter of Caruso v. Casciola

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LEO W. CARUSO et al., Appellants, v. MICHAEL A. CASCIOLA…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 16, 1970

Citations

261 N.E.2d 907 (N.Y. 1970)
261 N.E.2d 907
313 N.Y.S.2d 871

Citing Cases

Hall v. Dussault

denied5 N.Y.3d 706, 801 N.Y.S.2d 799, 835 N.E.2d 659 [2005] ). The record establishes that one of the…

Sira v. Smrtic

First, Vincent alleges that Sira committed fraud with respect to the designating petition "when she…