From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Caroline

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 25, 1994
206 A.D.2d 529 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

July 25, 1994

Appeal from the Family Court, Kings County (Segal, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the mother's application is denied, and matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

This is a child abuse proceeding instituted by petition of the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. Her child having been temporarily removed from her physical custody, the mother applied pursuant to Family Court Act § 1028 for return of the child, and the Family Court granted the application. We reverse.

The evidence adduced by the petitioner at the hearing demonstrated that the return of the child presents an imminent risk to the child's health (see, Family Ct Act § 1028 [b]). A Department of Social Services caseworker testified that on February 23, 1994, the child Caroline was examined at Coney Island Hospital and found to have multiple bumps, bruises, lacerations and scrape marks on her face. The physician who examined Caroline indicated that the injuries were inconsistent with the mother's explanation that Caroline fell from a bed and was scratched by the mother's ring during a bath. In addition, the caseworker testified that the mother had five other children who were not in the mother's care. One neglect proceeding was commenced against the mother because she had abandoned her son Antonio when she was using crack cocaine. Another neglect proceeding was commenced against the mother when Caroline was born with syphilis. Furthermore, although the mother's drug tests were negative, the mother admitted that she had been convicted of selling drugs in 1993.

In light of the evidence presented, the safer course is not to return the child to her home until further facts are adduced at a fact-finding hearing (see, Matter of Darnell D., 139 A.D.2d 610; Matter of Jennifer G., 105 A.D.2d 701). Rosenblatt, J.P., Copertino, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Caroline

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 25, 1994
206 A.D.2d 529 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Caroline

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CAROLINE C. CAROLINE C. et al., Respondents; COMMISSIONER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 25, 1994

Citations

206 A.D.2d 529 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
615 N.Y.S.2d 79

Citing Cases

Matter of Kimberly H

amily Court issued the order now on appeal, in which it found that Kimberly would not be at imminent risk if…

Solomon v. Denise

The mother also admitted that she failed to keep an appointment with her psychiatrist and neglected to take…