From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Carney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 8, 1999
263 A.D.2d 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

July 8, 1999

Respondent was admitted to practice by this court in 1981. He has maintained an office for the practice of law in New Jersey, where he was admitted in 1972.

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards (Geoffrey E. Major of counsel), Albany, for petitioner.

Before: CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, CARPINELLO, GRAFFEO and MUGGLIN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Based upon the report of a Special Master which found that respondent had converted substantial sums from his clients and others and which recommended his disbarment and a petition by the Office of Attorney Ethics alleging that respondent's continued practice posed a substantial threat of serious harm to his remaining clients, to other attorneys, and to the public, the Supreme Court of New Jersey, by order dated March 9, 1999, temporarily suspended respondent from the practice of law, effective immediately and until further order of that court.

In view of the above, we grant the motion by petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, for an order imposing reciprocal discipline upon respondent (see, 22 NYCRR 806.19) and conclude that respondent should be suspended from practice, effective immediately, and until further order of this court (see, e.g., Matter of Olitsky, 246 A.D.2d 910; Matter of Pisacane, 220 A.D.2d 981). Respondent has not replied to petitioner's motion.

ORDERED that petitioner's motion for an order imposing reciprocal discipline is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that petitioner is suspended from practice, effective immediately, and until further order of this court; and it is further

ORDERED that, for the period of suspension, respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and he is forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority or to give to another any opinion as to the law or its application, or of any advice in relation thereto; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this court's rule ( 22 NYCRR 806.9) regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys.


Summaries of

Matter of Carney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 8, 1999
263 A.D.2d 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Carney

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES F. CARNEY, an Attorney and Counselor-at-Law…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 8, 1999

Citations

263 A.D.2d 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
702 N.Y.S.2d 116

Citing Cases

Matter of Mitchell

The order was based on a petition by the New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics submitting clear evidence that…

In Matter of Carney

Per Curiam. Based on allegations of misconduct, the Supreme Court of New Jersey suspended respondent from…