From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Carlile v. Waite [4th Dept 1999

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1999
265 A.D.2d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

October 1, 1999

Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Stone, J. — CPLR art 78.

PRESENT: PINE, J.P., LAWTON, WISNER, HURLBUTT AND BALIO, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Stone, J.). We add only that a CPLR article 78 proceeding is "not the proper vehicle to resolve contractual rights" (Automated Ticket Sys. v. Quinn, 70 A.D.2d 726, 727, mod on other grounds 49 N.Y.2d 792; see, Matter of City Constr. Dev. v. Commissioner of New York State Off. of Gen. Servs., 176 A.D.2d 1145), and any alleged contract rights or remedies must be asserted in a plenary action.


Summaries of

Matter of Carlile v. Waite [4th Dept 1999

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1999
265 A.D.2d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Carlile v. Waite [4th Dept 1999

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF JOHN CARLILE AND PHYLLIS CARLILE, PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 920

Citing Cases

Town Bd. ex rel. Town of Brighton v. W. Brighton Fire Dep't, Inc.

We therefore modify the order accordingly. As an additional preliminary matter, we note that, although a CPLR…