From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Capobianco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 8, 1996
219 A.D.2d 179 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

March 8, 1996

Gerard M. LaRusso, Buffalo (Daniel Drake of counsel), for petitioner.

Lawrence J. Andolina of counsel, Rochester (Harris, Beach Wilcox), for respondent.


Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on February 7, 1986 and maintains an office in Rochester. The Grievance Committee filed a petition charging respondent with violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility. Respondent's answer denied material allegations of the petition and a Referee was appointed to conduct a trial on the issues of fact raised by the pleadings. The Referee filed a report that petitioner moves to confirm and respondent moves to reject.

The Referee found that respondent consistently failed to preserve and identify client funds in his attorney-client trust account, commingled his personal funds with his client funds in the trust account, used the trust account to pay for personal and business expenses, failed to maintain a running balance of his trust account activity and failed to maintain individual client ledger sheets reconciled with his trust account obligations.

We confirm the report of the Referee and conclude that respondent has violated the following Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility:

DR 1-102 (A) (5) and (8) ( 22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [5], [8]) — engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice and that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law; and

DR 9-102 (A), (B) and (C) ( 22 NYCRR 1200.46 [a], [b], [c]) — failing to maintain and preserve client funds and to keep records related to client funds entrusted to him.

We have considered the matters in mitigation, including the fact that no client sustained a financial loss as a result of respondent's misconduct. Therefore, we conclude that respondent should be suspended from practice for one year and until further order of the Court.

DENMAN, P.J., GREEN, LAWTON, FALLON and CALLAHAN, JJ., concur.

Order of suspension entered.


Summaries of

Matter of Capobianco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 8, 1996
219 A.D.2d 179 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Capobianco

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NICHOLAS CAPOBIANCO, an Attorney, Respondent. GRIEVANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 8, 1996

Citations

219 A.D.2d 179 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
639 N.Y.S.2d 242

Citing Cases

Matter of Rothschild

We also note that respondent has been active in providing pro bono services for poor and elderly clients. We…

Matter of Capobianco

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on February 7, 1986, and formerly maintained an…