Matter of Candee, Smith Howland Company

Full title: In the Matter of the Application of CANDEE, SMITH HOWLAND COMPANY…

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 1916

173 App. Div. 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

May, 1916.

Present — Clarke, P.J., Scott, Dowling, Smith and Page, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

The order appealed from is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that no leave to sue is necessary. ( Pierce, Butler Pierce Mfg. Co. v. Wilson, 118 App. Div. 662; Vitelli v. May, 120 id. 448.)

PER CURIAM:

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.