From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Campney v. People

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 18, 2001
279 A.D.2d 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

January 18, 2001.

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Washington County (Berke, J.), entered November 24, 1999, which denied petitioner's application pursuant to CPL 390.50 for a copy of his presentence report.

Randy Campney, Coxsackie, appellant in person.

Robert M. Winn, District Attorney, Fort Edward, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Petitioner applied to obtain a copy of the presentence report prepared in a criminal action against him which resulted in a judgment of conviction imposing an indeterminate term of imprisonment. Recognizing that, after final judgment in a criminal action, a defendant may obtain a copy of his or her presentence report in a collateral proceeding upon a proper showing of need (see, e.g., Matter of Blanche v. People, 193 A.D.2d 991), County Court examined petitioner's application and concluded that petitioner had failed to make the requisite showing. Petitioner appeals and we affirm. The need for the report alleged by petitioner is based upon his claim that he is planning to apply for certain prison programs and future parole release consideration, a claim which is speculative and insufficient to support petitioner's application (see, Matter of Kilgore v. People, 274 A.D.2d 636).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters and Rose, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Campney v. People

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 18, 2001
279 A.D.2d 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Matter of Campney v. People

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF RANDY CAMPNEY, Appellant, v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 18, 2001

Citations

279 A.D.2d 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
718 N.Y.S.2d 898

Citing Cases

People v. Zarzuela

As there is no pending appeal (CPL § 390.50[a]), and because defendant has not made a proper showing of need…

People v. Young

The nature of that proceeding is not defined by CPL 390.50 and, inasmuch as "County Court is vested with both…