From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Calabrese v. Commissioner of Police

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 2, 2001
282 A.D.2d 457 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued March 8, 2001.

April 2, 2001.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondents dated December 6, 1997, denying the petitioners' requests to be appointed to the rank of detective in the City of Yonkers Police Department pursuant to Civil Service Law § 58(4)(c)(ii), the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Fredman, J.), entered February 25, 2000, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Lovett Gould, White Plains, N.Y. (Jonathan Lovett of counsel), for appellants.

William M. Mooney, Yonkers, N.Y. (Kevin D. Crozier of counsel), for respondents.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Civil Service Law § 58(4)(c)(ii) provides, inter alia, that in certain jurisdictions, a person who has received a permanent appointment to the position of police officer and is "temporarily assigned to perform the duties of detective", shall, whenever such assignment exceeds 18 months, be permanently designated as a detective. The petitioners are not entitled to the benefit of the statute because they were not temporarily assigned to perform those duties.


Summaries of

Matter of Calabrese v. Commissioner of Police

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 2, 2001
282 A.D.2d 457 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Matter of Calabrese v. Commissioner of Police

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL CALABRESE, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 2, 2001

Citations

282 A.D.2d 457 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
722 N.Y.S.2d 421

Citing Cases

Otto Harnischfeger v. Moore

The legislative findings embodied in Civil Service Law § 58 (4) (c) (i) evince an intent to protect those…

Matter of Cieslinski v. Cassino

The petitioners are not entitled to the benefits of Civil Service Law § 58(4)(c)(ii) (see, Matter of…