From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bush v. Bush

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1996
229 A.D.2d 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

July 12, 1996

Appeal from the Steuben County Family Court, Purple, Jr., J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: On July 8, 1994, the parties stipulated to an order that granted them joint custody of their two children with primary physical placement to respondent and visitation rights to petitioner. Thereafter, petitioner sought a court order modifying the prior order by changing primary physical placement from respondent to him. Family Court granted the petition.

Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in granting petitioner "primary physical placement" of the parties' two children. The record establishes that petitioner "met the heavy burden of proof that the change in [placement] to him is in the best interests of the child[ren]" ( Matter of Ammann v. Ammann, 209 A.D.2d 1032, 1034; see generally, Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167; Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer, 55 N.Y.2d 89, 93-95; Fox v. Fox, 177 A.D.2d 209, 210).


Summaries of

Matter of Bush v. Bush

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1996
229 A.D.2d 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Bush v. Bush

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT BUSH, Respondent, v. JULIE BUSH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1996

Citations

229 A.D.2d 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
646 N.Y.S.2d 478

Citing Cases

Matter of Willard v. Smith

Contrary to respondent's contention, petitioner established that respondent is less fit to provide the…

Matter of Schattinger v. Schattinger

A similar agreement was approved in Matter of Studenroth v. Phillips ( 230 A.D.2d 247, 249-250), but there…