Opinion
May 28, 1996
Appeal from the Family Court, Queens County (Lubow, J.).
Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620; Matter of Jamal C., 186 A.D.2d 562, 563), we find that it was legally sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of reckless endangerment in the second degree ( see, Penal Law § 120.20; People v. Birdsall, 215 A.D.2d 878, 879; Matter of Louis Q., 180 A.D.2d 800; cf., People v Davis, 72 N.Y.2d 32, 36), and resisting arrest. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the court's determination was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15; People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490). Rosenblatt, J.P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.