We will not reverse a finding of contempt unless the trial court's decision was unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable. Snider at ¶ 6, citing Blakemore v. Blakemore, 5 Ohio St.3d 217, 450 N.E.2d 1140 (1983). We look to the totality of the circumstances in determining whether the trial court's decision constitutes an abuse of discretion. Ryder v. Ryder, 5th Dist. Stark No. 2001 CA00190, 2002-Ohio-765, 2002 WL 258218, *2, citing In re: Brumfield, 5th Dist. Stark No. 1998CA00326, unreported, 1999 WL 744172 (Jun. 7, 1999). Our standard of review of a contempt finding is “highly deferential.”
We look to the totality of the circumstances in determining whether the trial court's decision constitutes an abuse of discretion. Ryder v. Ryder, 5th Dist. Stark No. 2001CA00190, 2002-Ohio-765, *2, citing In re: Brumfield, 5th Dist. Stark No. 1998CA00326, unreported, 1999 WL 744172 (Jun. 7, 1999). {¶25} Mother contests the trial court's finding of contempt, but admits in her affidavit she did in fact violate the agreement as alleged.