From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Brooklyn Bar Association

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1928
225 App. Div. 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

November, 1928.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ.


Motion to confirm report of official referee granted, respondent disbarred, and his name ordered stricken from the roll of attorneys. The facts warranted the official referee in finding that respondent was guilty of a violation of section 1820-a, subdivision 2, of the Penal Law, in that, acting as a notary public, the respondent falsely represented in the acknowledgment of a general release that the person therein stated to have appeared before him and acknowledged the execution did so appear and acknowledge, when as a matter of fact he had not so appeared or acknowledged. The facts also fully justify a finding that the respondent was guilty of a misappropriation of his client's funds, and even a more serious wrong. His misconduct demonstrates his unfitness to continue the practice of his profession.


Summaries of

Matter of Brooklyn Bar Association

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1928
225 App. Div. 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Matter of Brooklyn Bar Association

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of the BROOKLYN BAR ASSOCIATION to…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1928

Citations

225 App. Div. 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)