From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Brodsky v. Murphy

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1967
231 N.E.2d 768 (N.Y. 1967)

Opinion

Argued September 26, 1967

Decided October 24, 1967

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Edwin R. Oberwager and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for appellants.

Morway Picket and Geoffrey P. Picket for respondents.

J. Lee Rankin, Corporation Counsel ( Stanley Buchsbaum and Samuel K. Handel of counsel), for City of New York, amicus curiae.



Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING and BREITEL.


Summaries of

Matter of Brodsky v. Murphy

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1967
231 N.E.2d 768 (N.Y. 1967)
Case details for

Matter of Brodsky v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of IRVING BRODSKY et al., Respondents, v. JOSEPH H. MURPHY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 24, 1967

Citations

231 N.E.2d 768 (N.Y. 1967)
231 N.E.2d 768
285 N.Y.S.2d 73

Citing Cases

Matter of Sheraton Corp. v. Murphy

Consequently, we conclude that the Tax Commission properly determined that the transaction was subject to the…

Matter of City of New York v. Murphy

Tax Commission seeking a determination that the mortgage recording tax was due only on $1,640,000. The State…