From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Brodsky v. Friedlander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 21, 2003
1 A.D.3d 1034 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

CA 02-02481.

November 21, 2003.

Appeals from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Makowski, J.), entered May 9, 2002, which, inter alia, denied respondents' motion to dismiss the Cplr article 78 petition and granted the petition.

Harter, Secrest Emery LLP, Buffalo (Carol E. Heckman of Counsel), for Respondents-Appellants John Friedlander, Mark Shields, M.D., M.B.A., and Michael Noe, M.D.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of Counsel), for Respondents-Appellants Michael Bernardino, M.D., and John Wright, M.D.

Kavinoky Cook, LLP, Buffalo (Marilyn A. Hochfield of Counsel), for Petitioner-Respondent.

Before: Present: Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Scudder, Kehoe, and Hayes, JJ.


ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeals be and the same hereby are unanimously dismissed without costs (see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]).


Summaries of

Matter of Brodsky v. Friedlander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 21, 2003
1 A.D.3d 1034 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Matter of Brodsky v. Friedlander

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF LINDA BRODSKY, M.D., Petitioner-Respondent, v. JOHN FRIEDLANDER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 21, 2003

Citations

1 A.D.3d 1034 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
767 N.Y.S.2d 372