From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bresnick v. Saypol

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 22, 1946
270 App. Div. 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Opinion

March 22, 1946.

Present — Martin, P.J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Peck, JJ.


In the absence of an answer showing bad faith of petitioner, it was error to decide this application in favor of the respondents. In the circumstances here the respondents should be afforded a further opportunity of answering the petition. The application for the order should be determined after the issues thus raised are disposed of. Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified accordingly, with costs to appellant and with leave to respondents to answer within ten days after service of the order to be entered herein, on payment of said costs. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Matter of Bresnick v. Saypol

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 22, 1946
270 App. Div. 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)
Case details for

Matter of Bresnick v. Saypol

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CARL S. BRESNICK, Appellant, against IRVING H. SAYPOL et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 22, 1946

Citations

270 App. Div. 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Citing Cases

Panhandle Cooperative Royalty Co. v. McLain

, makes it a defense (among others available) to "any corporation or officer or agent thereof" in any action…

Matter of Friedman

Since facts sufficient were set forth in the petition to indicate that petitioner may have been entitled to…