From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Brayman v. Stevens

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 2, 1967
20 N.Y.2d 868 (N.Y. 1967)

Summary

In Matter of Brayman v Stevens (20 NY2d 868), the Court of Appeals determined that a county officer was prohibited from also serving as a town supervisor under the restrictions imposed by County Law § 411.

Summary of this case from Spencer v. Cristo

Opinion

Argued November 1, 1967

Decided November 2, 1967

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOSEPH F. HAWKINS, J.

William V. Welch, County Attorney, and Charles O'Donnell, Jr., for appellants.

Bernard Kessler for respondent.


Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING and BREITEL.


Summaries of

Matter of Brayman v. Stevens

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 2, 1967
20 N.Y.2d 868 (N.Y. 1967)

In Matter of Brayman v Stevens (20 NY2d 868), the Court of Appeals determined that a county officer was prohibited from also serving as a town supervisor under the restrictions imposed by County Law § 411.

Summary of this case from Spencer v. Cristo
Case details for

Matter of Brayman v. Stevens

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of STANLEY J. BRAYMAN, Respondent, v. ROBERT E. STEVENS et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 2, 1967

Citations

20 N.Y.2d 868 (N.Y. 1967)
285 N.Y.S.2d 97
231 N.E.2d 787

Citing Cases

Spencer v. Cristo

There is no dispute here that a county legislator is an "elective county officer" and that a town councilman…

Stein v. Kings Cnty. Democratic Cnty. Comm.

Thus, "[g]iven the impracticability, if not impossibility, of properly identifying and joining all of such…