From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Brasileira v. Greenfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 12, 1995
211 A.D.2d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

January 12, 1995


Although it appears that the parties may have chartered their own course and acquiesced until now in the court's delay in rendering a decision on the post-trial motions by making intermittent submissions on the attorney's fee issue, a five year delay in the rendition of a decision is manifestly unacceptable. Accordingly, inasmuch as respondent states that a decision is "forthcoming," the petition is granted to the extent indicated.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Nardelli, Williams and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Brasileira v. Greenfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 12, 1995
211 A.D.2d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Brasileira v. Greenfield

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FROTA OCEANICA BRASILEIRA, S.A., Petitioner, v. EDWARD J…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 12, 1995

Citations

211 A.D.2d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
620 N.Y.S.2d 387