From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Braiter v. Addie Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 5, 1940
26 N.E.2d 277 (N.Y. 1940)

Opinion

Argued January 22, 1940

Decided March 5, 1940

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General ( Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for respondent.

Lester Lewis Jay and Philip F. Jacobs for appellant.


In the absence of proof that an employment certificate, vacation work permit or a certificate of age was on file in the place of claimant's employment (Labor Law [Cons. Laws, ch. 31], §§ 131, 132), it is no defense to a claim for double compensation under section 14-a of the Workmen's Compensation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 67), by a claimant employed in violation of section 131 of the Labor Law, that the employer was not negligent in determining the age of the claimant at the time of employment. ( Matter of Davidowicz v. Klipstein, 272 N.Y. 543; Matter of Kociolowicz v. Tonawanda Corrugated Box Co., 252 App. Div. 716; leave to appeal denied, 276 N.Y. 689.)

The order should be affirmed, with costs.

LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN FINCH, RIPPEY, SEARS, LEWIS and CONWAY, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Matter of Braiter v. Addie Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 5, 1940
26 N.E.2d 277 (N.Y. 1940)
Case details for

Matter of Braiter v. Addie Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of SAMUEL BRAITER, Respondent, against ADDIE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 5, 1940

Citations

26 N.E.2d 277 (N.Y. 1940)
26 N.E.2d 277

Citing Cases

Willis v. Storey

" Petitioner cites several New York and Pennsylvania cases which support the proposition that "certificate"…

Matter of Sackolwitz v. Hamburg Co.

An injured worker may not waive, assign or compromise his compensation or subject it to the claims of his…