From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Boyle

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 7, 1916
112 N.E. 1054 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued February 21, 1916

Decided March 7, 1916

Louis Frankel and Delos McCurdy for appellant.

Joseph G. Quinn, Jr., and Louis B. Hasbrouck for petitioner, respondent.

Eugene D. Boyer and Charles Strauss for Hannah B. Elger et al., respondents. Martin B. Faris for Florence M. Bell et al., respondents.

John Caldwell Myers for Dorothy H. Elger et al., respondents.

Benjamin H. Newell for John B. Bell, respondent.


Orders affirmed, with one bill of costs; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, CARDOZO, SEABURY and POUND, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Boyle

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 7, 1916
112 N.E. 1054 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Matter of Boyle

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of PHŒBE A.D. BOYLE, as an Executor and…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 7, 1916

Citations

112 N.E. 1054 (N.Y. 1916)
112 N.E. 1054