From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Borton v. McClintic-Marshall Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

March, 1929.


Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Van Kirk, P.J., Davis, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur; Hinman, J., dissents on the ground that there is no evidence to sustain the finding that the claimant was the common-law wife of deceased; and on the authority of Hill v. Vrooman ( 215 App. Div. 847; affd., 242 N.Y. 549).


Summaries of

Matter of Borton v. McClintic-Marshall Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Matter of Borton v. McClintic-Marshall Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ADELINE V. BORTON, Respondent, against…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1929

Citations

226 App. Div. 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)