Opinion
June 1, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.).
Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly annulled the denial of the area variance in question on the ground that the denial was arbitrary and capricious and was not supported by substantial evidence (see, e.g., Matter of Sasso v. Osgood, 86 N.Y.2d 374; Matter of Hampshire Mgt. Co. v. Nadel, 241 A.D.2d 496; Matter of Frank v. Scheyer, 227 A.D.2d 558; Matter of Marcello v. Humenik, 222 A.D.2d 677).
Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Copertino and Goldstein, JJ., concur.