From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Boddie v. County of Westchester

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 27, 1973
33 N.Y.2d 835 (N.Y. 1973)

Opinion

Argued November 15 1973

Decided December 27, 1973

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department.

John J.S. Mead, County Attorney ( Alfred J. Mungo of counsel), for respondents-appellants. Alfred Olsen for appellant-respondent.


On respondents' appeal: Order affirmed, without costs.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, JONES and WACHTLER. Judge BREITEL dissents and votes to reverse in the following opinion in which Judges JASEN and GABRIELLI concur.

On petitioner's appeal: Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the grounds that petitioner was not aggrieved by the modification at the Appellate Division (CPLR 5601, subd. [a], par. [iii]) and no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.


The finding by the commissioner, invulnerable to judicial review, that appellant Boddie waved a loaded revolver at inmates under his charge in a local jail not only merited dismissal of Boddie, but would merit complaint against the commissioner if he retained Boddie in so sensitive a position. The waving of a loaded revolver at the inmates demonstrated unfitness for the position, and the sanction imposed was therefore proper (cf. Matter of Traber v. Feinstein, 39 A.D.2d 643, affd. 32 N.Y.2d 860). Moreover, it is suggested that humane considerations on behalf of helpless persons in custody should outweigh sympathy for a custodian who is so insensitive to his responsibility.

Accordingly, I dissent and vote to reverse on the commissioner's appeal and to reinstate his determination.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Matter of Boddie v. County of Westchester

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 27, 1973
33 N.Y.2d 835 (N.Y. 1973)
Case details for

Matter of Boddie v. County of Westchester

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES BODDIE, Appellant-Respondent, v. COUNTY OF…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 27, 1973

Citations

33 N.Y.2d 835 (N.Y. 1973)
351 N.Y.S.2d 975
307 N.E.2d 47

Citing Cases

Pilawa v. City of Utica

In summary, of the six charges, only charges numbered two and seven have support in the record. Although…

Matter of Lee v. Bd. of Educ

Respondent's authority for this contention is based upon the inherent power of the courts pursuant to CPLR…