From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bobrow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 9, 1997
243 A.D.2d 795 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

October 9, 1997

Appeal from Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Claimant was employed by a packaging business in which he was also an officer, director and 50% shareholder. In 1994, a dispute arose between claimant and his coshareholder over the terms of their shareholder's agreement. The dispute was resolved in April 1995 when claimant entered into a settlement agreement with the corporation in which he agreed to sell his shares and, in conjunction therewith, resigned from his positions with the corporation. We find that substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's decision disqualifying claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Although claimant maintains that he was forced out of the business by actions of his coshareholder, the Board, in the exercise of its power to determine issues of fact and credibility, concluded that this contention was unfounded; we find no reason to disturb this determination. Inasmuch as substantial evidence supports the finding that claimant did not have a compelling reason to leave his employment, we affirm the Board's decision ( see generally, Matter of Schonwit [Sweeney], 241 A.D.2d 618; Matter of Sparber [Sweeney], 226 A.D.2d 858).

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Bobrow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 9, 1997
243 A.D.2d 795 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Bobrow

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JOSEPH BOBROW, Appellant. JOHN E. SWEENEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 9, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 795 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 335

Citing Cases

Matter of Kavaler

In any event, personality clashes with a business partner have been held not to constitute good cause to…

In the Matter of Gindi

When the friendship with his partner deteriorated, claimant agreed to his partner's demands that claimant…