From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bluttal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 23, 1993
199 A.D.2d 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 23, 1993

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Given the failure of claimant to submit new evidence to support his request for reconsideration, we find no abuse of discretion in the Board's rejection of the application. In any event, substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that claimant's activities on behalf of a corporation of which he was a major stockholder constituted employment within the meaning of the Unemployment Insurance Law. Claimant's failure to reveal his activities in this regard support the further conclusion of willful misrepresentation.

Weiss, P.J., Crew III, Cardona, White and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Bluttal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 23, 1993
199 A.D.2d 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Bluttal

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of RICHARD BLUTTAL, Appellant. JOHN F. HUDACS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 23, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
605 N.Y.S.2d 524