From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bloom v. N.Y. City Transit Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 14, 1963
19 A.D.2d 521 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Summary

reversing lower court's decision to treat Rosh Hashanah as a dies non and refusing to interpret the New York legal holiday statute to include "all days of general religious observance"

Summary of this case from Epstein v. State

Opinion

May 14, 1963


Order entered on October 17, 1961, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion to compel acceptance of notice of claim pursuant to section 50-e Gen. Mun. of the General Municipal Law as timely served, denied. The legislative history indicates that a day of religious observance is not to be deemed a public holiday unless so proclaimed by the President or the Governor. (See L. 1875, ch. 27; L. 1887, ch. 289; L. 1889, ch. 198; Code Civ. Pro., § 3343, subd. 21 [1901]; L. 1892, ch. 677, § 24; General Construction Law, § 24; Executive Law, § 7.) An interpretation of the statute to bring all days of general religious observance within the statutory definition of a holiday, without requirement of executive proclamation, would lead to confusion and indefiniteness in the application of the statute. A construction, having this result, is to be avoided where, as here, it is not plainly indicated. (McKinney's Cons. Laws of N.Y., Book 1, Statutes, § 143.)

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Bastow, JJ. [ 31 Misc.2d 805.]


Summaries of

Matter of Bloom v. N.Y. City Transit Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 14, 1963
19 A.D.2d 521 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

reversing lower court's decision to treat Rosh Hashanah as a dies non and refusing to interpret the New York legal holiday statute to include "all days of general religious observance"

Summary of this case from Epstein v. State
Case details for

Matter of Bloom v. N.Y. City Transit Auth

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RUTH BLOOM et al., Respondents, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 14, 1963

Citations

19 A.D.2d 521 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Citing Cases

Epstein v. State

We cannot usurp the Legislature's prerogative and sanction Yom Kippur as a dies non juridicus which would…