From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Block v. Stroheim Romann, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 28, 1994
203 A.D.2d 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 28, 1994

Appeal from the Workers' Compensation Board.


Claimant, who was employed as a showroom assistant for a fabric and wall covering jobber, allegedly developed acute depression as a result of his transfer from the back showroom of the employer to the front showroom, where he had to deal with less knowledgeable retail customers. Claimant subsequently ceased working and applied for workers' compensation benefits, contending that he had suffered an accidental injury under the Workers' Compensation Law. We find substantial evidence to support the Board's finding that the stress created by claimant's job transfer was no more than that normally encountered in a work environment and therefore could not result in a compensable injury. We have considered claimant's other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, White, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Block v. Stroheim Romann, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 28, 1994
203 A.D.2d 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Block v. Stroheim Romann, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of DANIEL BLOCK, Appellant, v. STROHEIM ROMANN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
611 N.Y.S.2d 355

Citing Cases

In re Troy

, including his nonwork-related physical illnesses, combined with a normal amount of stress at work resulting…

In re Claim, Charlotten v. N.Y. State Police

In the absence of any evidence of discrimination or harassment by claimant's supervisors, the Board could…