From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Blasy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 4, 1991
170 A.D.2d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

February 4, 1991

Appeal from the Surrogate's Court, Putnam County (Braatz, S.).


Ordered that the order dated June 7, 1989, is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated July 10, 1989, is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs payable by the appellants personally.

Since the appellants had the opportunity to contest the issues raised on this appeal during a prior appeal which was dismissed for lack of prosecution they are estopped from doing so now (see, Bray v Cox, 38 N.Y.2d 350; Matter of Smith v McManus Sons, 101 A.D.2d 890). The appeal from so much of the order dated July 10, 1989, as recites that relief was granted by the court's prior order dated June 7, 1989, is dismissed as the appellants are not aggrieved thereby. Brown, J.P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Blasy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 4, 1991
170 A.D.2d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Matter of Blasy

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANGELINA BLASY, Also Known as ANGELINA MANDL, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 4, 1991

Citations

170 A.D.2d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

Doe v. Rosenthal

Therefore, the motion was unnecessary. We note parenthetically that while the plaintiff may enter a judgment…