From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 21, 1992
183 A.D.2d 1094 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

May 21, 1992

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Claimant does not dispute the fact that although the decision of the Administrative Law Judge denying her claim for benefits was mailed to her on April 3, 1990, she did not file an appeal until after the 20-day statutory time period to do so had expired (see, Labor Law § 621). At a hearing to determine only the question of the timeliness of her appeal, claimant explained that she never read the back of the decision which set forth the 20-day time period. Under the circumstances, the decision by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant's appeal was untimely must be upheld (see, Matter of Chapman [Roberts], 138 A.D.2d 866; Matter of Gavin [Levine], 52 A.D.2d 1006).

Weiss, P.J., Yesawich Jr., Crew III, Casey and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Bland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 21, 1992
183 A.D.2d 1094 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Bland

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MAEBELLE B. BLAND, Appellant. JOHN F…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 21, 1992

Citations

183 A.D.2d 1094 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
583 N.Y.S.2d 693

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Chincarini

Although claimant acknowledged that she received that decision shortly after it had been mailed, she did not…