From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Blades v. Twomey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 29, 1990
159 A.D.2d 868 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

March 29, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Greene County (Cobb, J.).


Petitioner, an inmate at Coxsackie Correctional Facility in Greene County, arranged to receive a package containing a typewriter. Respondent Superintendent of Coxsackie Correctional Facility denied permission to receive the typewriter because it had a value in excess of $200 in violation of the limit imposed by 7 NYCRR 724.4 (g) (26) and (27) and Departmental Directive No. 4911. Petitioner's administrative appeal was denied and this CPLR article 78 proceeding was commenced. In rejecting petitioner's contention that Correction Law § 138 precluded the Superintendent's determination, Supreme Court held that disciplinary issues were not involved. We agree. That statute prohibits the imposition of punishment upon an inmate for misconduct in violation of prison rules and regulations unless such rules and regulations are posted in prominent locations within the prison and written copies are provided to inmates. There was no disciplinary action or punishment imposed in this case.

Petitioner's contention that the absence of a posted copy of the property possession limitation precludes its enforcement is without merit. Petitioner, an inmate legal assistant, while arguing the unavailability of Departmental Directive No. 4911, does not allege his unawareness of, or the unavailability of, the published State-wide regulation found in 7 N.Y.CRR part 724, which contains the codification of all departmental directives. Regardless of petitioner's awareness of the limit, correction officials have the right and duty to control the property and possessions within the prison under their supervision. The Superintendent's reliance upon the regulation was reasonable and provides a rational basis to exclude the subject property from the prison.

Judgment affirmed, without costs. Casey, J.P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Blades v. Twomey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 29, 1990
159 A.D.2d 868 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Blades v. Twomey

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES BLADES, Appellant, v. JOHN TWOMEY, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 29, 1990

Citations

159 A.D.2d 868 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
553 N.Y.S.2d 215

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Anstey v. Davis

See also, Brinson v. McKeeman, 992 F. Supp. 897, 910 (W.D.Tex. 1997) ("access to typewriters and copy…

People ex Rel. Hicks v. James

Without question, the Superintendent of a correctional facility has the authority to grant or deny permission…