From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Blackstone

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 24, 1902
64 N.E. 1120 (N.Y. 1902)

Summary

In Matter of Blackstone (171 N.Y. 682) we followed the decision in the Houdayer case and again taxed the deposit of a non-resident in a New York trust company.

Summary of this case from Matter of Clinch

Opinion

Argued June 9, 1902

Decided June 24, 1902

Edward W. Sheldon for appellant.

Julius Offenbach and Thomas Penney for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs, on the ground that this case is controlled by Matter of Houdayer ( 150 N.Y. 37). Motions to dismiss appeal and to correct record denied, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, HAIGHT, VANN, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ. Dissenting: O'BRIEN, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Blackstone

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 24, 1902
64 N.E. 1120 (N.Y. 1902)

In Matter of Blackstone (171 N.Y. 682) we followed the decision in the Houdayer case and again taxed the deposit of a non-resident in a New York trust company.

Summary of this case from Matter of Clinch
Case details for

Matter of Blackstone

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Appraisal of the Estate of TIMOTHY B. BLACKSTONE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 24, 1902

Citations

64 N.E. 1120 (N.Y. 1902)
64 N.E. 1120

Citing Cases

Matter of Gordon

In Matter of Clinch, the property which furnished the occasion for question in regard to taxation consisted…

Matter of Gordon

" And in Matter of Clinch ( 180 N.Y. 300) it was said: "In Matter of Blackstone ( 171 N.Y. 682) we followed…