From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Biatolbzski v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 1, 1941
262 App. Div. 1051 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Opinion

October 1, 1941.

Appeal from State Industrial Board.

Present — Hill, P.J., Bliss, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ.


The claimant was engaged as a general handy man and to do rough carpentry and tree trimming at five dollars per day. There was no estimated contract price for one particular job. The employer furnished some tools which were unsatisfactory and then the claimant used his own tools. The employer furnished some of the equipment and while claimant was working trimming a tree and the employer's foreman was working with him, claimant fell and was injured. On this evidence the finding of the Industrial Board that claimant was an employee cannot be disturbed. Appellants raise the further point that the denial by a single member of the Industrial Board of their request to submit the case to the full membership of the Board constituted an arbitrary exercise of power and unwarranted under the statute. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.


Summaries of

Matter of Biatolbzski v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 1, 1941
262 App. Div. 1051 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)
Case details for

Matter of Biatolbzski v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of CHARLES BIATOLBZSKI, Respondent, against…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1941

Citations

262 App. Div. 1051 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)