From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bethon v. Mesiouris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 1995
222 A.D.2d 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 29, 1995

Appeal from the Family Court, Queens County (Schindler, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner seeks to be allowed to take the parties' eight-year-old son with her to an Immigration and Naturalization Service training program in Georgia for approximately four months. In light of the disruptive influence that such a move would have on the child's visitation with his father and on his schooling and home environment, we agree with the Family Court that the proposed move is not in the best interests of the child (see, Domestic Relations Law §§ 70, 240; Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167; Matter of Schimler v Schimler, 203 A.D.2d 580).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P.J., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Bethon v. Mesiouris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 1995
222 A.D.2d 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Bethon v. Mesiouris

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SUSAN BETHON, Appellant, v. CHARIS MESIOURIS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
636 N.Y.S.2d 95