From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Berry v. New York City Bd. of Educ

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1997
239 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 1, 1997

Appeal from the Workers' Compensation Board.


While on vacation, claimant sustained a back injury when she slipped and fell on the stairs at the employer's district office while she was picking up her paycheck. The Workers' Compensation Board, finding that claimant sustained a compensable injury within the course of her employment, awarded her workers' compensation benefits. The employer appeals, contending that the accident did not arise out of or in the course of claimant's employment.

Testimony at the hearing revealed that the employer would distribute a yearly schedule noting the dates on which employees should pick up their paychecks. Claimant and her supervisor, who was responsible for distributing the paychecks at the district office, testified that it was mandatory that employees, or an authorized person, pick up their paychecks, even if the employee was on vacation. They further testified that it was the employer's policy that paychecks could not be mailed. While the employer's testimony controverted these statements, this merely created a credibility issue for the Board to resolve ( see, Matter of Billings v. Dime Sav. Bank, 236 A.D.2d 649, 650). Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the Board's decision that claimant's injury arose out of and in the course of her employment is supported by substantial evidence ( see, Matter of Rodriguez v. Sunnyside Garden Kennels, 27 A.D.2d 967, lv denied 20 N.Y.2d 643) and it is, accordingly, affirmed. The employer's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, White, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Berry v. New York City Bd. of Educ

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1997
239 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Berry v. New York City Bd. of Educ

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MONICA BERRY, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 1, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 786

Citing Cases

Claim of Wint v. Hotel Waldorf Astoria

er of La Celle v. New York Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists, 235 A.D.2d 694, lv dismissed 89 N.Y.2d 1085;…

Matter of Grucza v. Waste Stream Technology

Further, in resolving conflicting medical proof the Board may selectively adopt or reject portions of a…