Opinion
Argued June 6, 1913
Decided June 20, 1913
Charles Haldene for appellant.
Roger Hinds for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK, CHASE, HOGAN and MILLER, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Matter of Berry
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 20, 1913
102 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1913)
Summaries of
Matter of Berry
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 20, 1913
102 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1913)
Case details for
Matter of Berry
Case Details
Full title:In the Matter of Proving the Will of INSLEE H. BERRY, Deceased. SARAH C…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 20, 1913
Citations
102 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1913)
102 N.E. 1099
Citing Cases
Woolley v. Hutchins
It is a rule that has been adopted to avoid intestacy in whole or in part, but it is only applied where it is…
Maynard v. MaynardKalish v. Kalish, 166 N.Y. 368; Smith v. Chesebrough, 176 id. 317; Matter of Colegrove, 221 id. 455; Matter…