Opinion
December 17, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.).
Petitioner claims he was entitled under respondents' regulations to be evaluated under the Unauthorized Occupancy Program (UOP) for a tenancy. In February 1992, the UOP policy was superseded by the Successor Tenant Rules under which petitioner is currently being evaluated for a tenancy. Accordingly, the appeal is moot.
Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Ross and Rubin, JJ.