From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Berrios v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 17, 1992
188 A.D.2d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 17, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.).


Petitioner claims he was entitled under respondents' regulations to be evaluated under the Unauthorized Occupancy Program (UOP) for a tenancy. In February 1992, the UOP policy was superseded by the Successor Tenant Rules under which petitioner is currently being evaluated for a tenancy. Accordingly, the appeal is moot.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Ross and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Berrios v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 17, 1992
188 A.D.2d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Berrios v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANGEL BERRIOS, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 17, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)