Opinion
July 24, 1995
Appeal from the Family Court, Kings County (Yancey, J.).
Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the petition sufficiently identified the charges against him ( see, People v Farson, 244 N.Y. 413, 417; see also, Matter of Eric K., 100 Misc.2d 796, 799). Therefore, a bill of particulars was not required since the appellant was not entitled to matters of evidence relating to how the presentment agency intended to prove the elements of the offenses with which he was charged ( see, Family Ct Act § 330.1 [a]; cf., Matter of Edgar L., 66 Misc.2d 142, 144).
The appellant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or, if error, harmless. Sullivan, J.P., O'Brien, Thompson and Santucci, JJ., concur.