From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Beneky v. Waterfront Comm. of N.Y. Harbor

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 30, 1977
366 N.E.2d 1349 (N.Y. 1977)

Opinion

Argued June 7, 1977

Decided June 30, 1977

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, ABRAHAM J. GELLINOFF, J.

Reynold A. Mauro for appellant.

Irving Malchman and Richard Paul Cohen for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. Petitioner, an investigator for the Waterfront Commission, concedes that he met with a reputed organized crime figure, who had been a target of numerous investigations by the commission, and that this meeting did not occur in the regular course of his employer's business. As a nontenured employee, petitioner was not entitled to a full adversary hearing concerning the reasons for the termination of his employment unless there was proof that the discharge was for an improper reason or in bad faith. (See, e.g., Matter of Anonymous v Codd, 40 N.Y.2d 860; Matter of Bergstein v Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 318, 322; Board of Regents v Roth, 408 U.S. 564.) But, here, the proof failed to show improper motivation or bad faith and, thus, no hearing was required. In fact, the commission did more than it was required to do, under the Constitution and its own rules, by granting petitioner an opportunity to examine the reports which charged him with improper conduct and by permitting him to explain his actions. As to the claim that a hearing was necessary in view of the stigma attaching to the termination of his employment, it is sufficient to note that no hearing is necessary where the employee fails to "affirmatively" challenge "the substantial truth of the material in question". (Codd v Velger, 429 U.S. 624, 627-628.)

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Matter of Beneky v. Waterfront Comm. of N.Y. Harbor

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 30, 1977
366 N.E.2d 1349 (N.Y. 1977)
Case details for

Matter of Beneky v. Waterfront Comm. of N.Y. Harbor

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIS BENEKY, Appellant, v. WATERFRONT COMMISSION OF NEW…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 30, 1977

Citations

366 N.E.2d 1349 (N.Y. 1977)
366 N.E.2d 1349
397 N.Y.S.2d 995

Citing Cases

Matter of Pelaez v. Waterfront Commission

We reverse. We assume, without deciding, that the commission is correct in its position that it had the right…

Shih v. Waterfront Commission

Petitioner's termination did not violate Executive Law § 296 (15) and (16). Disorderly conduct, a violation,…