From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Belmont v. Paramount Publix Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1935
246 App. Div. 661 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

November, 1935.

Appeal from State Industrial Board.

Present — Hill, P.J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.


The employer was engaged in the business of operating a theatre and claimant was employed by it as a dancer. While engaged in her regular occupation and while walking off the stage she tripped over a cable causing a lamp to fall which struck her on the head and resulted in injuring her teeth. As a result the right upper lateral incisor was damaged to such an extent that it became necessary to extract it and to replace the same with a permanent tooth fixed in two gold inlays serving as abutments. The total expense was $113, $13 of which was incurred prior to the extraction of the tooth. Appellants have appealed from the award of $100 for services in replacing the extracted tooth. The replacement of a tooth is "such medical, surgical or other * * * treatment * * * and apparatus * * * as the nature of the injury * * * may require," as authorized by section 13 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.


Summaries of

Matter of Belmont v. Paramount Publix Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1935
246 App. Div. 661 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Matter of Belmont v. Paramount Publix Corporation

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of EDDIE BELMONT, Respondent, against PARAMOUNT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1935

Citations

246 App. Div. 661 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Citing Cases

Matter of Katz v. National Kream Co., Inc.

The award was proper. ( Matter of Belmont v. Paramount Publix Corporation, 246 App. Div. 661.) Award…