From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Belmar v. City of Syracuse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 6, 1984
100 A.D.2d 745 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

March 6, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Sullivan, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Denman, Boomer, O'Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, with costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Laureah Belmar fell upon a sidewalk in the City of Syracuse and filed a notice of claim against the city and the County of Onondaga. The city and the county dispute ownership and control of the sidewalk. Before any action was begun, the county made this motion for an order providing that "should the County of Onondaga undertake repairs of the sidewalk * * * the same shall not constitute an admission of ownership and control of the premises; and * * * the fact of such repairs shall be inadmissible, irrelevant and incompetent evidence at trial of issues in this case". Special Term granted the motion. ¶ Absent specific statutory authority for instituting a motion prior to the commencement of an action, the court was without jurisdiction to entertain the motion (see Matter of Cammaratta, 60 Misc.2d 521). Moreover, there is no procedure in a civil action that would allow Special Term to suppress evidence or make rulings on evidentiary questions in advance of trial.


Summaries of

Matter of Belmar v. City of Syracuse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 6, 1984
100 A.D.2d 745 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Matter of Belmar v. City of Syracuse

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JACK A. BELMAR, Individually and as Executor of LAUREAH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 6, 1984

Citations

100 A.D.2d 745 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Andrews v. Coryea

Even assuming, arguendo, that the court erred in precluding petitioner from presenting testimony regarding…