From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Beal v. Beal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 24, 1997
244 A.D.2d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 24, 1997

Appeal from the Family Court, Nassau County (Feiden, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well established that suspension of child support payments is warranted only where the custodial parent's actions rise to the level of "deliberate frustration" of the noncustodial parent's visitation rights ( Hiross v. Hiross, 224 A.D.2d 662, 663). In 1991, the father consented to an order suspending his rights to visitation with the parties' three children. Since he had no visitation rights, he cannot claim an interference with any such rights as a basis to reduce or stay his child support obligations. Accordingly, the Family Court correctly dismissed the father's petition.

Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Beal v. Beal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 24, 1997
244 A.D.2d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Beal v. Beal

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JEFFREY BEAL, Appellant, v. ROBIN BEAL, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 24, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
664 N.Y.S.2d 473

Citing Cases

NK v. MK

After careful consideration, the court has not economically penalized the mother or the child because it…

Mazzola v. Lee

Here, the father, in support of those branches of the petition which sought to add a therapeutic component to…